| Projects |
Info Tech |
Business |
Education |
Science |
||
| Business strategy | |||||
| Solving operational IT problems | Developing procedures | ||||
| Upgrading a company's network | |||||
| Cost-effective computing |
|
||||
| Web strategies | Climbing Google's hit list | ||||
| IT training | |||||
| Data management | |||||
| Multimodal teaching | |||||
| Online teaching | |||||
| Competency | Learning to use a microscope | ||||
| Television series | Growing Awareness | ||||
| Other | Commercial building |
| Web strategy |
Climbing Google's hit-list Since the inception of the World Wide Web, web-page creators have tried
to elevate their web pages on the hit lists of the search engines. In
turn, the search engines have tried to identify manipulative practices. |
|
|
|
|
|
| Data management |
Commercial CD-ROM I co-managed the production of the Burnley Plant Directory, a cross-platform CD-ROM product comprising a number of relational databases sharing information and pictures. The product contains data on over 1200 plants and over 4000 photographs of them (including some of mine). This product is aimed commercially at the general gardening public as well as landscape architects and others involved in selecting plants for particular growing conditions. It will also be used by institutions that teach about plants and need their students to get to know a suite of plants and their characteristics. In the initial stages of the project, I identified the methodology that should be used for collecting the data. I took no further role in the project until a couple of years ago, when the project appeared to be foundering. Then, I proposed that I should devise and implement the software and interface for the product. At that time, I again joined the management team of the project, working with a graphic artist, botanists and horticulturists to bring the project to completion. The CD-ROM has been commercially published by Melbourne University Press with CSIRO Publishing acquiring rights to it. |
|
|
|
| Multimodal teaching |
The diversity of life Background and objectives This unit provides an introduction to biological diversity and ecology for students undertaking their first semester of degree-level biology in diverse courses, e.g. environmental science and nursing. It is based on a unit that had already run for many years and the primary institutional objective of this development was to make the unit/subject suitable for distance education (with no attendance component). Early discussions showed that it was possible to achieve this and, at the same time, improve the on-campus experience. Although it was not an objective to reduce teaching loads of the four lecturers involved, it was important that these should not be increased. The result is a unit that has been radically transformed:
The product Weekly learning objectives were formally identified and strong guidance was provided through weekly topic outlines that also summarized the sources of materials. Primary knowledge (information) was acquired independently by students (rather than by lectures). Each week's topic comprised many (short) readings from the prescribed textbook, linked by text materials written by the lecturers, on the CD-ROM. Aspects that were not appropriately covered by the textbook were dealt with in fact sheets, many of which were written by the lecturers. About 2.5 hours of movies, ranging in duration from 10 seconds to a few minutes and much of it shot in-house, augmented those materials, providing 'live' examples, contextualization and case study materials. Web links further enriched the topics. Work sheets were used in a range of ways: guiding the students to the important points of movies and reading; pulling together concepts; extending the learners to higher-order thinking. Answers were provided for many of the work sheets - some students preferred to go directly to these rather than undertaking the exercises. Although some interactive materials are provided on the CD-ROM, most of the content does not readily lend itself to the intense interactions of simulation. Interpersonal, individualized interaction was most favoured, either via the discussion board or in weekly workshops. The quality of Internet access precluded full web-delivery; this was confined to less bandwidth-intensive modalities. The workshops were loosely structured and were conducted differently by the different lecturers. The objective was to provide discussion around the topic areas, contextualizing, enhancing, remediating but not for delivering more primary material. Practical exercises could be carried out in the laboratories or at home. Assessment was by weekly quizzes (online), assignments and examination. Outcomes In comparison with the previous year, the class results showed a greatly increased number of high-performing students with no detriment to the pass-level students. Feedback from focus meetings with students was impressively positive. Formal contact time for staff was decreased but this was offset by increased engagement in the online discussions, although these could now be conducted at the convenience of the staff. This is a flagship development for the institution. Detailed presentations and discussions of the philosophy, design and implementation of this unit to biology teaching staff at 10 Australian institutions have drawn comments ranging from high praise to superlatives. This project was conducted for a university client. I headed the development team (academic staff and technical support), guided the pedagogy, provided professional development to the staff, created the template, wrote some of the content, wrote and assembled paper-based materials, formatted the content, shot and edited movies, created the graphics and assembled the final product. Please note. The complexity of the pedagogy underlying this unit cannot be adequately expressed in these few paragraphs. For further information, please email. |
|
|
|
| Other projects | This is not an exhaustive list of projects! |
PO Box 2331 |